Get real PRINCE2-7-Practitioner exam questions for better preparation

A product description contains only the following quality specification for the car-parking component: "The shopping centre will include an underground car park." Is this an effective application of the quality practice, and why?

• A. No, because all details of the car park should be recorded only in the quality management approach
• B. Yes, because the statement provides sufficient information to confirm whether the required component has been delivered
• C. No, because the product description needs sufficiently detailed, measurable quality specifications and tolerances to support planning and verification
• D. Yes, because confirming that a car park exists completely specifies its required quality

Before the end of stage 2, the project board authorizes a change that adds more trees and seating to the external landscaping. The change can be delivered in stage 3 without any forecast breach of project tolerance.
While preparing the next stage plan, the project manager incorporates the additional products and work, updates the relevant product descriptions and product register entries, and reviews whether the project initiation documentation needs to be updated.
Is this an appropriate application of 'prepare the next stage plan', and why?

• A. Yes, because the next stage plan should reflect authorized changes, with affected product information and the project initiation documentation updated where necessary
• B. Yes, because every authorized change must be implemented through an exception plan before the related work may enter the following stage
• C. No, because authorized changes should remain outside the next stage plan until the project has been re- authorized by the business layer
• D. No, because project assurance should prepare the next stage plan and update the affected product information independently of the project manager

While selecting the project approach, the team identifies that a traditional delivery method and the proposed use of external suppliers could make the sustainability requirements harder to achieve. The risk is recorded in the project log for consideration during initiation.
Is this an appropriate application of 'starting up a project', and why?

• A. No, because a risk that is classified as manageable does not pose a threat to overall project viability and should be deferred for consideration during the initiation stage when more detailed planning takes place using the traditional delivery method
• B. Yes, because the primary purpose of assessing the project approach at this stage is to clarify the prospective obligations of the project team and each external supplier when delivering the project products
• C. No, because any sustainability requirements that the project must satisfy should be captured as user quality expectations in the project product description, not as risks in the project log
• D. Yes, because the way the project work will be delivered directly influences how the management approaches are designed, and identifying risks early helps ensure the PID accurately reflects how sustainability will be managed

RISK
Here are three items of information relating to the 'risk' practice.
In which management product (A-E) should each item be recorded?
Choose only ONE management product for each item of information. Each management product may be used once, more than once, or not at all.

• A. Quality management approach
• B. Risk management approach
  Item 1:
  A cracked pane has already been identified and replacement is planned for next week. The project manager records the separate uncertainty that the supplier may miss that future replacement date and delay subsequent work.
  Item 2:
  The agreed procedure states that the project board and project manager will review all open risks during every end stage assessment.
  Item 3:
  The project will use a red-amber-green scale to classify risks according to their overall severity.
• C. Risk register
• D. Issue report
• E. Issue register

While preparing the project plan, the project manager and BuildyBrick's planning specialist use the product flow and data from previous projects to determine that the utilities and systems can be delivered in parallel as separate work packages.
Is this an appropriate application of the 'plans' practice, and why?

• A. Yes, because product dependencies determine sequence, and independent work packages may be planned to run in parallel
• B. No, because setting work-package tolerances determines the order in which products must be produced
• C. No, because work delivered by the same supplier must be scheduled sequentially and should avoid running in parallel
• D. Yes, because data from previous projects should determine the schedule without reviewing the dependencies between the products