Get real CCA-F exam questions for better preparation

You are using Claude Code to accelerate software development. Your team uses it for code generation, refactoring, debugging, and documentation. You need to integrate it into your development workflow with custom slash commands, CLAUDE.md configurations, and understand when to use plan mode vs direct execution.
Your team frequently migrates React components to Vue. You've written a step-by-step workflow for Claude Code to follow during each migration, and you want every developer on the team to invoke it by typing /migrate-component. The workflow should stay in sync as the team iterates on it. Where should you place the skill file?

• A. In the project's.claude/settings.json using a skillOverrides entry to register and define the workflow
• B. In .claude/skills/migrate-component/SKILL.md at the project root, committed to version control
• C. In ~/.claude/skills/migrate-component/SKILL.md on each developer's machine
• D. As a detailed instruction block in the project's root CLAUDE.md file

You are using Claude Code to accelerate software development. Your team uses it for code generation, refactoring, debugging, and documentation. You need to integrate it into your development workflow with custom slash commands, CLAUDE.md configurations, and understand when to use plan mode vs direct execution.
Your team's CLAUDE.md includes a rule: "Use 4-space indentation and always run Prettier formatting." Despite this, code reviews reveal that roughly 30% of files Claude Code generates use inconsistent formatting - sometimes 2-space indentation, sometimes missing trailing commas. Adding emphasis ("IMPORTANT: You MUST use Prettier formatting") reduces violations to about 15%, but doesn't eliminate them. What is the most effective way to ensure all generated code is consistently formatted?

• A. Add a Stop hook with a prompt-based check that evaluates whether generated code follows formatting standards and prompts Claude to fix violations.
• B. Extract the formatting rules into a dedicated skill that Claude loads automatically when generating code, with more detailed examples of correct formatting.
• C. Configure a PostToolUse hook with an Edit|Write matcher that automatically runs Prettier on each file Claude modifies.
• D. Split the formatting rules into path-scoped .claude/rules/files that load when Claude works on matching file types.

You are using Claude Code to accelerate software development. Your team uses it for code generation, refactoring, debugging, and documentation. You need to integrate it into your development workflow with custom slash commands, CLAUDE.md configurations, and understand when to use plan mode vs. direct execution.
You need to add a date validation check ensuring event dates are in the future. This requires adding a conditional statement to one existing function in a single file. What is the most appropriate approach?

• A. Start with extended thinking mode enabled to ensure thorough reasoning about the validation logic.
• B. Enter plan mode to analyze how the validation might impact other parts of the reservation flow.
• C. Enter plan mode first to create a detailed implementation strategy before making the change.
• D. Use direct execution to make the change.

The agent verifies customer identity through a multi-step process before resetting passwords.
During testing, you notice that after the customer answers the third verification question, the agent asks them to provide their name again, as if the earlier exchange never happened. What's the most likely cause of this behavior?

• A. Claude's memory retention is limited to two conversational turns by default, requiring explicit configuration to extend it.
• B. The prompt lacks instructions telling Claude to remember information across multiple exchanges.
• C. The verification tool is clearing the agent's internal state after each successful validation step.
• D. The conversation history isn't being passed in subsequent API requests.

The synthesis agent receives summarized findings from the web search and document analysis agents, then passes a consolidated summary to the report generator. During testing, you discover the generated reports make factual claims without proper citations - the report generator cannot attribute statements to their original sources because that metadata was lost during the summarization steps. What's the most effective approach to ensure proper source attribution in the final reports?

• A. Skip summarization and pass full raw outputs from web search and document analysis directly to the report generator.
• B. Instruct the synthesis agent to embed source references inline within its summary text using a consistent citation format.
• C. Have the report generator query the web search agent to re-locate sources for claims in the final report.
• D. Have each agent output structured data separating content summaries from source metadata (URLs, document names, page numbers).